Posted by: Anji | Sunday 18th July 2010

Completed the Race For Life!

So I completed the Race For Life. All five kilometres of it, and I didn’t walk a single step! I did it in 43 minutes which I feel is quite a respectable time, especially for a fat disabled woman. :D

Considering I was only on week 5 of Couch To 5K, and was jogging no more than 26 minutes at once, I’m feeling very, very proud of myself for managing 43 minutes without stopping. And I felt like I could have continued, too!

I’m not sure I’m going to continue with Couch To 5K now. I’ve proved to myself that I can jog for five kilometres, so I think I’ll draw myself up a few routes of 5K each and just do one of those three times a week. :)

(Also I’ll be cheeky and say you can still sponsor me here if you like!)

Posted by: Anji | Thursday 15th July 2010

Carnival!

The twelfth Carnival of Feminist Parenting is now up over at Mothers For Women’s Lib. It’s a bumper issue this month, with nearly seventy amazing posts for your perusal.

You can find it here: Twelfth Carnival of Feminist Parenting.

Posted by: Anji | Wednesday 14th July 2010

Race For Life

This Sunday I will be running (well, slowly jogging) five kilometres in the Race For Life to raise money for Cancer Research UK. I’m planning not to walk any of it, which for a fat disabled woman is quite an undertaking!

I set a fundraising goal of £100 and when I reached that I set it to £150 which I passed today, so I’ve re-set my goal to £200. I’m currently at £185 – can you help me break two hundred? You don’t have to spend a lot; every single pound counts towards my goal.

So if you have a few quid spare, please consider going to my fundraising page and donating. Don’t forget to Gift Aid it if you’re a UK taxpayer!

Posted by: Anji | Friday 2nd July 2010

Why I Don’t ‘Support Our Troops’

I do not “support our troops”. There, I said it. Those five words are enough to bring out the rabid patriot in almost any British person I might speak with. It feels like everywhere I turn there are Help For Heroes window stickers and newspaper articles about “our boys” in Afghanistan and Iraq. Even the people I know who are anti-war are quick to state that they still support the troops because “they’re only doing their jobs.”

This is where I differ from many people who are anti-war. You see, I don’t think “they’re only doing their jobs” is any defence for the men and women in the Armed Forces.

We all know that many innocent people – non-combatant men, women and children – are killed in war zones. This is undisputed fact. They may or may not be deliberately killed, but there is always going to be some degree of ‘collateral damage’; that is, “damage that is unintended or incidental to the intended outcome” (thanks Wikipedia for wording that much better than I was going to) and much of that ‘collateral damage’ is loss of innocent human life.

Before I go on, I think it’s important for me to say that I don’t think there is any such thing as acceptable collateral damage. This is the main reason I am anti-war. In any war situation, innocent men, women and children are going to die, and even if those deaths are accidental, they are unacceptable. My problem with ‘supporting our troops’ is that though they may be ‘only doing their jobs’, they are doing a job which involves, inherently, being part of the deaths of innocent people.

Upon joining the armed forces (and any man or woman deciding to sign up to join the Army, Navy or Royal Air Force chooses to do so, there’s no such thing as conscription in the United Kingdom), there are two ways that the recruit could be thinking:

The first thing they could be doing is not thinking about collateral damage at all (or thinking it won’t happen to them); not thinking about the very distinct possibility that they will end up killing an innocent person. Any person joining the armed forces should know that they are going into a job where they may end up killing innocents, and to simply bury their heads in the sand and not think about it, or to think it would never happen to them, is naive and thoughtless. For these people I have no sympathy and offer no support because they have shown they do not care for the people they may end up killing.

The second thing they could be thinking is that though they don’t want to kill innocent people, they may end up doing so. The people who are thinking this are those who believe that there is an acceptable level of ‘collateral damage’. If they think like this and they still join the armed forces, I have no sympathy and offer no support, because again, they have shown that they do not care for the people they may end up killing.

(There is a third option, that they know they may end up killing innocent people and are comfortable or even excited about that, but I’m willing to concede that this third option is but a tiny minority of recruits; I’d hate to think that this sort of person formed a sizeable chunk of new recruits to the armed forces.)

So they’re “just doing their jobs”, as the argument goes. They’re doing jobs which they themselves chose to do; nobody forced them to enlist. They’re doing jobs in which they are likely to end up killing non-combatants, killing women and children, and they either delude themselves about it or simply don’t care. Forgive me then, for having no feelings of support for these people. I am happy and proud to say I don’t support the troops, I know many people will disagree with me, and I’m perfectly comfortable with that.

Posted by: Anji | Sunday 27th June 2010

How do you teach a child about sex?

As a parent, sex education for children is something that’s really important to me. I want my son to grow up with a healthy view of sex and relationships. I want him, if and when he becomes sexually active, to have a good understanding of how sex works, knowledge of contraception (and a feeling of personal responsibility for using it), informed consent and the issues surrounding domestic violence.

I am aware that most schools teach sex education from a fairly young age – I believe mine started in school around year 4, so I would have been about eight years old – but I believe that the sex education children receive in schools is greatly lacking and think that the greatest responsibility for sex education lies with parents.

For me, this means sex education starts early. From the moment our children start naming body parts, sex education begins. I hate it when children learn ‘cutesy’ terms for their genitalia. We don’t use euphemisms for any other body parts, and the use of them for genitalia, in my opinion, does nothing but teach them that their ‘private parts’ are taboo, dirty or shameful. Another important reason for teaching our children the proper terms for their body parts is so that in cases of abuse children can adequately describe what has happened to them. So from a young age, I have taught my son the proper words for genitals. He knows he, like most boys and men, has a penis and testicles and that Mummy, like most women, has a vulva and ovaries.

My method of teaching a child of such a young age is to answer every question he asks fully, but not to give any more information than he asks for. By not answering any more questions than he has actually asked, I reduce the risk of over-confusing him and allow him to learn about these things at his own pace.

For example, when he asked me what his penis was for, I told him it was for urinating and sex and he accepted that as an answer with no more detail. When he asked me what sex was, I told him it was something adults do for fun and sometimes to make babies. He hadn’t asked me about the mechanics of sex, so I didn’t go any further. When he asked me where my eggs came from, I told him “from my ovaries” and when he asked to see them, I found an excellent diagram. When he asked me how he got into my uterus, I told him that Daddy helped put him there, and when he asked how, I told him “with his penis”.

As he grows older, I’m fully expecting him to ask more questions, and that’s perfectly normal. Children are naturally curious people, and considering the reproductive system is a pretty impressive ‘piece of kit’ – humans growing whole other human beings within their bodies! – it’s only natural that they will ask questions about where they came from and how it all happens. I plan to continue my method of answering frankly, with no embarrassment or shame, every question he asks. I think that “with no embarrassment or shame” part is pretty important too, because as I said, the last thing I want to do is to make him think that any part or function of the human body is embarrassing or shameful.
I plan to introduce awareness of domestic violence, and have already started that by talking with him about violence in general, how it’s not nice to hurt someone’s feelings or their body, and encouraging him to express himself in positive and constructive ways.

Another thing I think is really important, especially when raising a boy, is to raise him with a good understanding of ‘enthusiastic consent’, though I’m not sure how or when I will raise that issue with him yet. Rape culture is so prevalent that I think it’s important that boys learn “no means no”, and that the lack of a no does not automatically mean consent, and equally that girls learn they can say “no” and that they have the right to have that “no” respected.

I’m really interested in other people’s methods – including people like me with young children, and perhaps especially parents/guardians of older children, so I can garner ideas for my son’s coming years. How are you teaching your children, male or female, about their bodies and their functions?

Cross-posted at The F Word.

Posted by: Anji | Sunday 20th June 2010

How do you raise a child in a feminist manner?

One of the things I was certain of, even throughout my pregnancy, was that I wanted to instil a sense of fairness and equality in my child. I didn’t really know how I was going to do it, but I had some basic ideas – the clothes he would wear, the toys he would play with, the way I would explain the world to him.

I planned to dress my son in gender-neutral clothing, offer him choices of trousers or dresses, that sort of thing. However, my ex-partner and I split up when my son was eight months old, and I get the feeling he’d hit the roof if he came to pick up my son dressed in a floral frock! I have to admit that part of this is also protective; I don’t want other children (or adults) to make fun of my son for what he’s wearing, so I dress him mostly in conventionally masculine clothing.

On the play issue, I’ve fared slightly better. My son loves all things wheeled; cars, trains, even bin lorries. But he also has his baby doll, Tommy, complete with pink toy pushchair, his wooden toy kitchen and tea set and the myriad cuddly toys which are slowly taking over my house and which must be looked after at all costs. I encourage him to play in the garden kicking a ball around, but also spend time with him baking cakes and letting him ‘help’ with cooking dinner.

But clothes and toys do not a future feminist make. The most important thing, to me, is the way I raise him, the conversations we have and the examples I and the other adults in his life set him regarding gender stereotypes.

One of the things I’ve noticed as he grows older is that he’s started noticing sex. Before, he knew the words ‘penis’ and ‘vulva’ and that assigned-males have one and assigned-females the other and that was the only difference he knew of between men and women. Lately – with influence no doubt from preschool friends and non-feminist family members – he has started categorising some things as specifically ‘male’ or ‘female’.

At a recent craft day at the museum he had to wear an apron. I picked up the nearest one, which happened to be pink. He screwed his face up and said “Not that one, Mummy, that’s a girls’ one!” He couldn’t articulate exactly why it was a girls’ one, but he ‘knew’ it was. He tells me “Mummies don’t go to work”. I work hard to counter these newly-formed opinions by telling him colours are for everyone, and that many Mummies do work – and many Daddies stay home! Unfortunately it seems that the ideas he’s getting from outside influences are having more of an effect on him than my counter-arguments.

My partner and I try to model an egalitarian relationship to my son. I buy him books which feature strong female characters (if you’re not a parent you might not know that those are few and far-between) and try to monitor the programmes he watches on Cbeebies because so much of it is male-centred with (white, cis, currently-abled) male protagonists. I encourage him to value things which are traditionally seen as ‘feminine’ as well as those seen as ‘masculine’ and to not think of one as inherently more worthwhile than the other.

But it’s so hard. Babies are born with no preconceptions of gender. They don’t know that their genitalia means they will be expected to look, dress, and act in a certain way. It is only what we do as role models that shapes a child’s view on sex and gender.

And no matter how hard I try, there are still so many other factors coming into play – his other family members, his friends at preschool, the characters he sees in books and films and television programmes. I am not raising my son in a void, and it’s incredibly difficult to undo what he’s been told and shown of “what boys do” and “what girls do”. I really envy the Swedish couple who are raising their child gender-neutrally; it looks like one of the only ways to ensure a child grows up with no preconceived notions of how zie should be based on zir genitals.

So that’s my attempt, still ongoing, at raising a feminist-minded boy. I’m sure I haven’t covered everything (not least because I have a word limit here!), and I’m sure there’s much more I could be doing, so I want to ask – how are you raising your children into the next generation of feminists?

Cross-posted at The F Word.

Posted by: Anji | Friday 11th June 2010

Borderline Personality Disorder – a feminist critique

Among my many diagnoses, I have what is known in the UK as Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder (Of The Borderline Type), known elsewhere as Borderline Personality Disorder. BPD is described by Wikipedia as “a prolonged disturbance of personality function … characterized by depth and variability of moods.” It manifests in many ways, including rapid cycling mood swings, ‘self-destructive behaviour’, black and white thinking, disassociation and extreme fear of abandonment.

BPD is a serious mental illness and is difficult to diagnose. Unfortunately it is also well-known as being used by psychiatrists and mental health professionals as a way of labelling ‘difficult’ or ‘problem’ patients – I know at least one woman who was threatened with a diagnosis of BPD by a mental health professional because she wouldn’t do as she was told.

Three-quarters of patients diagnosed with BPD are female. I’ve spent some time since my diagnosis wondering why that is, when one would expect the split to be roughly 50/50.

My first thought is that the diagnostic criteria cover much of what is considered to be “stereotypically feminine” behaviour, but to a more extreme level. For example, one of the diagnostic criteria, “Affective instability due to a marked reactivity of mood (e.g., intense episodic dysphoria, irritability or anxiety usually lasting a few hours and only rarely more than a few days).” – well, women are supposed to be overly emotional people anyway, right? Another of the criteria is “Frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment.” We’ve all heard the stereotyped stories of bunny boilers, of women who get pregnant to ‘trap their man’, of women who are controlling and possessive and who are terrified of being alone. Women are supposed to be flighty, unable to control their emotions, and to have trouble navigating their interpersonal relationships.

The second thing I’ve been thinking about is that it’s possible that women get the diagnosis of BPD because some of the diagnostic criteria include things which are considered ‘normal’ for men, but ‘abnormal’ for women. For example, if a woman behaves in an ‘unfeminine’ way, say by expressing extreme anger (another of the diagnostic criteria is “Inappropriate anger or difficulty controlling anger (e.g., frequent displays of temper, constant anger, recurrent physical fights)”), the label of BPD is slapped on her by the psychiatrist. “Frequent displays of temper, constant anger [and] recurrent physical fights” are not seen as disordered behaviour in men, they are seen as fairly normal. But it seems that when a woman displays those tendencies she is not normal, she is personality disordered.

Another of the criteria is “Impulsivity in at least two areas that are potentially self-damaging (e.g., promiscuous sex, eating disorders, binge eating, substance abuse, reckless driving).” Again, some of these things seen as “potentially self-damaging” (I’m looking at ‘promiscuous sex’ and ‘reckless driving’ in particular) are seen as normal behaviours for men, but in women are considered undesirable enough to be included in the criteria for diagnosing a serious mental illness.

And lastly, I’ve been wondering whether Borderline Personality Disorder is a mental illness/personality disorder at all. Considering so many more women are diagnosed with it than men, and considering it’s thought to develop in early childhood rather than being an innate mental illness, could there be something about being raised female which increases women’s propensity towards BPD-type thinking? Could that ‘inappropriate anger’ be not a disordered way of thinking, but valid female rage against a world which devalues women and things which are thought of as ‘traditionally feminine’?

As I said at the beginning of this post, I have a diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder and I believe this to be accurate because my life is severely impacted by my symptoms. But I often wonder if, in a world where men and women were seen as equal, where women were valued and seen as being as worthy as men, whether this diagnosis would exist at all. Or, in an ideal world where women were not seen as ‘other’ and our natural behaviours were not seen as ‘deviant’, whether the world would be more shaped for women (and men) displaying Borderline type symptoms and thus our lives would not be so devastatingly impacted by it. One thing I do know is that as a diagnosis in the current climate, it is extremely stigmatising and for many women it seems to do more harm than good.

Cross-posted to The F Word.

Posted by: Anji | Saturday 5th June 2010

Refugee and Migrant Justice needs your help!

Refugee and Migrant Justice is a charity who provide free legal advice and representation to asylum seekers and other vulnerable migrants in the UK, including victims of trafficking and separated children. They are, in their own words, “the largest specialist provider of advice and representation to asylum seekers and other migrants needing protection or other help to secure their human rights. As well as helping individual clients, we use our considerable expertise to campaign for positive changes.”

They are facing possible closure because of bureaucratic rules that result in the Government not paying promptly for asylum and immigration legal work. A new system of payment of legal aid means that payments are only made when stages of cases are closed. In RMJ’s case, that is on average six months after work is started and can take up to two years due to delays in the asylum system. As they say, “We are not asking for more money, just prompt payment of what we are due.”

If they close, 10,000 asylum seekers will be left without the legal advice and representation they desperately need to get a fair hearing in a system that is characterised by a culture of disbelief. They have fled torture, persecution, widespread violence, and the threat of death. 900 of them are children; many have been trafficked.

If you would like to help out, there is more information including a campaign leaflet available to download at their website, along with a letter template for you to write to the relevant ministries and your MP. You can also join the campaign on Twitter and Facebook.

Cross-posted to The F Word.

Posted by: Anji | Wednesday 17th March 2010

Fifteenth Carnival of Feminists

Welcome to the fifteenth edition of the Carnival of Feminists. I’m very proud to be hosting this Carnival for a second time, so I’m not going to waffle on at you – I’m going to get straight on with the Carnival goodies!

Rape and Violence

  • Aban Mukherji writes Acid Attacks and Real Nightmares, a description of domestic violence involving an acid attack, and the author’s reactions to the story.

Reproductive Rights

  • In Women Deserve Better, Righteous Mom talks about her problem with the ‘feminists for life’ movement, explaining why she thinks the phrase “women deserve better (than abortion)” is problematic.

Language

  • In That Slight Discomfort You May Feel, Thomas gives a great explanation of why the term ‘cis’ (as in ‘cissexual’ and ‘cisgender’) is an important one for allies to understand.

People

  • Mandytoomey introduces two women of note: health researcher Linda Neuhause and Professor of Brazilian Literature Zelia Bora.

Privilege

  • Britni TheVadgeWig presents On Privilege, a response to a blog post written about privilege, denying that it exists and is an important concept.

  • Fertile Feminism presents Getting it, talking about well known feminist/Fat Acceptance blogger Kate Harding and imploring her to understand the parallels between the FA/HAES movement and that of children’s rights.
  • Hannah Mudge has a post about Equality and the privileged woman, writing about privileged women’s disapproval of feminism while simultaneously reaping its benefits.

Sex and Sexuality

  • Another one from Fbomb is Owning Up to My ‘Number’ where the author makes peace with her ‘number’ (i.e. number of sexual partners).

International Women’s Day

Sexism

  • In Let’s Kill Chivalry! Apu talks about her problems with the traditional concept of ‘chivalry’ and calls for it to be replaced with common courtesy from and to all.

News and Media

  • Skunen1 wrote a book review of “Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl” by Harriet Jacobs which submitter Bryan describes as “an insightful review of an important feminist non-fiction book”.
  • Cara writes On Prison Rape and Complacency talking about the huge problem with rape in prison, from rape between inmates to rape by prison staff, quoting an article written about how to address it.

That concludes this edition of the Carnival of Feminists. Thanks to everyone who submitted articles and posts for this edition, and please don’t forget to submit your blog article to the next edition of the Carnival using the carnival submission form.

If you’d like to host, contact Lindsay or Amelia at (firstname).impersonator [at] gmail.com – I’d recommend you do, because it’s a lot of fun!

Previous editions of this Carnival can be found in the sidebar of the carnival home page.

Posted by: Anji | Tuesday 16th March 2010

Carnival of Feminist Parenting

The tenth Carnival of Feminist Parenting is now up at Mothers For Women’s Lib, go and check it out!

And don’t forget to submit your posts and articles for next month! Submissions can be made using our carnival submission form or sending the URL in an @ reply to @m4wl on Twitter. Past posts and future hosts can be found on our blog carnival home page.

Older Posts »

Categories